Contributions for second-line legal aid · Judgment 77/2018
Belgian Constitutional Court · 21 June 2018
A person could qualify for subsidised legal representation in Belgium and still have to find money to appoint a lawyer and begin proceedings. An individual and associations challenged changes to the second-line legal-aid scheme. For a household with little spare income, repeated flat fees could determine whether it was possible to pursue a case.
The remedy and its limit
The Constitutional Court annulled the rules imposing the disputed flat-rate contributions. It assessed the burden from the position of people who qualified for free or partly free assistance. Calling a sum modest did not establish that they could afford it. The judges preserved the effects of contributions already collected in certain cases for which the lawyer had reported to the legal-aid bureau by 31 August 2018.
Identify the charge before challenging it
A legal-aid contribution, a court fee and a private lawyer’s invoice are different charges. Keep the award of legal aid, the payment request, the date and the description of the charge. The ruling dealt with specified statutory contributions. It does not mean every later invoice is unlawful or that all historic payments must be refunded.
Read judgment 77/2018 in French
More decisions from Belgium · Explore the European Case Law Journal · Individual consultation times and fees
